Sachhin who is going to represent the data of 70 pointers in SC ?

@Devanjan I was just trying to create a possible win-win situation. Who knows there might be more PILs coming our way. Kids selected after 28th got a chance only after IST removal. And IST is the bone of contention right now. We have tied ourselves in knots here, and courts have been part of the problem rather than the cure.

And on a lighter note it is better to profess ones opinion here than to go for a PIL. May be someone throws up an interesting idea. Sometimes complex problems  have simple solutions only if people are willing to listen.

Sachhin what may happen tmw, HC will hear the case?

Dear Sushil , i wish LG/DOE had discussed new guidelines with all stakeholders we would have not seen such a mess..

But unfortunately SC cannot make guidelines it will only upheld or strike down. It is LG/DOE who make guideline/rules/law.

So it is a golden opportunity for LG/DOE to rise above their egos and take the case out of SC by submitting before SC that they will revise the guidelines and will consider all contentious issues raised in all the litigations so far. If all parties agree to it SC will also allow DOE/LG to review guidelines. BUT SELECTED APPLICANTS/PARENTS WILL BE ANGRY WITH ME but that is the only solution to come out of litigation. SC will not pass verdict on 21st April 99% sure. If courts are presurrised then erroneous orders like last HC order are passed.

ALL THE BEST

 

Sushil, on a lighter note why r u harsh towards the kids who got selected after 28th feb! They also got through a lottery. I guess now it's high time that we should stop professing our thoughts and opinions. Let the relevant people take a decision and close it. For heaven sake we are talking about pre primary admissions- kids who r 3 years old!!!!!!! Sorry Sushil nothing personal but I am very frustrated with the state of things, I hope you understand.

I hope SC makes following decision.

Mark valid the draws for 70 pointers done prior to IST points removal. All other draws after that invalid

Reserve 3% seats (Not 5 points)  in each school for IST cases just for this year. This will create a pool of seats good enough to accommodate genuine IST cases. It will offset the argument of genuine IST that their chances have reduced due to lesser seats vacant

For rest of the seats do draw of lots for all 70 pointers including leftover IST and finish the process in 15 days flat. 

Hope it is a win-win formula for everyone....

Just for the sake of record, my case is of a 70 pointer and so far unlucky..

Suman

I 100% concur with Sachin  Sapra .

 

Let me simplify the interpretation. SC order means that at present, status which existed before passing of 3 rd April 2014 HC order, shall prevail. i.e no classes, admission process stand still as if no HC order of 3 APril was passed. Even 4th April 2014 circular is stayed. Making choice issue also, as of now stayed. But this does not mean that HC order was illegal but SC has prima facie found fault in the order and has agreed to hear IST grievance. If SC is satisfied after hearing all parties that HC order was correct then it may restore the order or amend the order or may pass some other order.

Till 21st everyone give time to your lovely children.

all the best

 

Sakshi
I hope you agree with the interpretation by Sachhin Sapra on DoE order of today. Please inform