Form Dates | Admission Criteria | Results | Fee Details | List of All Schools
New Delhi: The Delhi high court on Friday issued notice to the lieutenant governor on a PIL challenging the latest nursery admission guidelines on the ground it clubs the economically weaker section (EWS) category with that of children with disabilities.
A bench of Justice Ravindra Bhat and R V Easwar also issued notice to Centre and Delhi government’s education department on the plea that also wants 3% seats for children with disabilities in aided and unaided private schools in Delhi. Posting the case for February 25 to hear the plea further, HC asked the LG to apprise the court on what steps have been taken to keep a quota for disabled children in schools since earlier guidelines provided the same.
Appearing for the state government, advocate Zubeda Begum informed HC she will seek instruction from the LG on the issue. The LG had on December 18 last year issued fresh guidelines. According to the petitioner, the guidelines erred in treating disabled group of children together with children of economically weaker section to provide them a common 25% quota in nursery admissions.
Challenging the decision, the petition termed the move “unreasonable” as the challenges faced by these two classes of children differ greatly. “Both category faces different challenges, especially from the point of view of education where much greater care and attention is required to be given to children with disabilities whereas children from economically weaker sections can more easily assimilate with the general category of students as they do not suffer from any form of cognitive or learning disability,” the counsel for the petitioner argued.
The counsel said the interest of children with special needs or disabilities have been “completely ignored” in the attempt by the authorities concerned to make free education available to as many children as possible.
The petition further informed HC that as per the data available out of 237 (Provided by AdmissionsNursery.com) schools in Delhi only 43 schools have capability to cater the needs of disabled children. “It is also a matter of very serious concern that only a few schools have the necessary infrastructure to cater to the needs of such children, despite directions to such schools by the high court to provide the necessary infrastructure. Therefore also, such children stand to be completely disadvantaged,” the plea contended, seeking quashing of the amendment to Section 2(d) of the Right to Education Act, 2009 for clubbing the two categories.
Tags:
Join Amita Garg. i don't know whether you fall in special needs case.
I also agree with the PIL. There should be separate reservation for DG category also like job reservations for various classes. Say 30% reservation for OBC applicants in govt. jobs. Clubbing both EWS and DG is really discriminatory as truly depicted in PIL. The status of prevailing physical and economical condition differs with EWS, therefore, PIL is justified and should be heared favourably.
I fully agree with the PIL.
Very true... EWS category is basically meant to Economicaly Weaker Section of the society, i.e., for parents earning less than 1 lac per year. Hence, govt. subsidised for their education.
Whereas other sections of the society like Single Parent, SC/ST, Children with special needs require a quota in the total seats and not the free seats as their parents are in a position to pay for the school of their choice.
Therefore, it should be like this:
15% seats - EWS/Orphans quota No Fees
5% seats - Staff No fees
10% seats - SC / ST/OBC category Normal Fees
5% seats - Minority category Normal Fees
3% seats - Children with disabilities Normal Fees
2% seats - Single Parent Normal Fees
50% seats - General Category Normal Fees
10% seats - Management category High Fees (No donation) to subsidise fees for all other categories
© 2025 Created by Sumit Vohra (Webmaster).
Powered by
helpdesk@admissionsnursery.com