Nursery Admissions in Delhi NCR 2024-25
Admission Dates | Admission Criteria | Compare schools | Fee Details
Times of India /Asian Age - "What about parents who have already paid a quarters' fees as per the last HC decision?Will schools refund them if the session begins after the summer vacation? Sumit Vohra
String of nursery admission orders puzzles parents
Parents have begun consulting their own lawyer acquaintances for clarity. "A client of mine is an SC lawyer. I had a talk with him on the current situation. What he told me about SC dates is very alarming. He told me that in SC, dates are given many months away in normal cases and if the SC thinks the case is very sensitive and time-bound, and needs an immediate judgment, the best they can do in these cases is give dates 20 days away," says a parent. Another parent adds that it seems unlikely - factoring the schools' summer vacations and the courts' dates, along with general delays - that the process will begin before September.
There is also worry over the fees that many paid during the few days admissions were permitted by the high court. That round closed on April 9 and the April 3 order allowing admissions has been stayed by Supreme Court. "One court told us to decide and deposit fees within a few days and another has stayed that process. We had secured the seat for our child by paying a handsome amount," says another.
Some parents gathering on admissionsnursery.com are even considering appealing to the petitioners and asking them to withdraw the case.
"What about parents who have already paid a quarters' fees as per the last HC decision? Will schools refund them if the session begins after the summer vacation? Many parents, expecting the case to go on till after the summer vacations have cancelled holiday plans," says Sumit Vohra of admissionsnursery.com. He adds that several minority schools - and even the odd non-minority one - beginning session on April 15, has confused parents further. The starting of session on April 15 wasn't a high court direction but that of Directorate of Education.
Rashtrya Saharaराकेश नाथ/एसएनबी नई दिल्ली। राजधानी के पब्लिक स्कूलों में नर्सरी की पढ़ाई शुरू नहीं हो सकती है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट में दाखिले को लेकर लगाए स्टे के बाद सेशन शुरू करने को लेकर भी रोक लग गई है। शिक्षा निदेशालय के निदेशक पदमिनींिसंघला ने कहा कि स्कूल फिलहाल सेशन शुरू नहीं कर सकते हैं। पहले जो आर्डर निदेशालय की ओर से निकाला गया था, वह 4 अप्रैल का था लेकिन 15 अप्रैल को सुप्रीम कोर्ट द्वारा दाखिले पर लगाए गए स्टे के बाद पहले वाले ऑर्डर पर भी रोक लगती हुई दिख रही है। यदि किसी स्कूल ने सेशन शुरू कर दिया है, तो उन्हें यह नर्सरी का सेशन रोकना होगा। बता दें कि हाईकोर्ट में बुधवार को सुनवाई के बाद अपनी सुनवाई 7 मई तक टाल दी है। एडमिशन नर्सरी डॉटकॉम के प्रमुख सुमित वोहरा ने कहा कि कोर्ट ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट के फैसले के आने तक की बात कहते हुए सुनवाई टाल दी है। उन्होंने कहा कि स्कूलों में नर्सरी की क्लासेज न शुरू होने से अभिभावक भी परेशान हैं। उनका कहना है कि उन्होंने तीन महीने की फीस दे दी है और स्कूलों में पढ़ाई नहीं हो रही तो उनकी दी हुई फीस क्या रिफंड नहीं होनी चाहिए। शिक्षा निदेशक पदमिनी सिंघला ने बताया कि स्कूलों में सेशन को लेकर फिलहाल रोक की स्थिति है, स्कूल नर्सरी का सेशन शुरू नहीं कर सकते हैं। साथ ही उन्होंने यह भी कहा कि फिलहाल सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश को लेकर लीगल एडवाइस ली जाएगी कि नर्सरी का सेशन शुरू किया जा सकता है या नहीं और इस बाबत एक स्पष्टीकरण जारी किया जाएगा। पीतमपुरा वसुधा एन्कलेव स्थित एमएम पब्लिक स्कूल की प्रधानाचार्य रुमा पाठक ने कहा कि सेशन शुरू करने को लेकर भ्रम की स्थिति बनी हुई है, इस कारण स्कूल ने नर्सरी का सेशन शुरू नहीं किया। उन्होंने कहा कि इस भ्रम की स्थिति को देखते हुए निदेशालय को जल्द ही एक स्पष्टीकरण जारी करना चाहिए जिससे स्कूल व अभिभावकों को राहत मिले। रोहिणी स्थित माउंट आबू पब्लिक स्कूल की प्रधानाचार्य डॉ ज्योति अरोड़ा ने कहा कि बुधवार को फोरम ऑफ पब्लिक स्कूलों की एक बैठक हुई, जिसमें इसी बात को लेकर र्चचा शुरू की गई। डॉ अरोड़ा ने कहा कि यदि निदेशालय का स्पष्टीकरण आ जाए तो सोमवार तक स्कूल में नर्सरी का सेशन शुरू करने का विचार कर रहे हैं।
नर्सरी एडमिशन शिक्षा निदेशालय सेशन शुरू करने को लेकर लेगा लीगल एडवाइस सेशन चालू करने को लेकर पब्लिक स्कूलों ने की बैठक 7 मई तक टल गई नर्सरी की सुनवाई पेरेंट्स की टेंशन बढ़ी, अब और इंतजार
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by jully shalini on
-
@Mahesh Jain, Totally agree with you...
-
Permalink Reply by mahesh jain on
-
@jully shaliNi .. thanx and i think every parent here is not after money but want there kids to get into some school....But if session not start now Then all of us will feel cheated
-
Permalink Reply by Suman Kalra on
-
By when we can expect DoE order after taking legal advice as now it will play a significant role
-
-
Dear all, if DOE will come up with any guidlines about the fee for first quarter. Then its most likely that it will come in the favour of school lobby.
-
-
If we look at this issue from a myopic and materialistic view, then if no services is provided then no fee should be charged from us. But if we analysis that we are entrusting a school with 14 years (168 months) of our child to build their future and if we have to bear a monetary loss (materialistic view) of 3 or 4 months, I do not think it is a big issue. To expect schools to be run ethically we also have to have that ethics (charity starts from home) and understand the limitation of other person too. Schools have also some limitations, they are not run for charity, have also have some liability and just to grudge for a fee of a quarter (three months) is something which I feel to a certain extent is unethical considering the long relationship that we are going to have with a school. Most to us who have deposited the fee must be alumni or sibling cases and if we plead for our case for extra benefit in admission by way of marks for alumni and sibling then I think that much we owe to that school. Or one just takes a myopic and selfish view as taken by the persons who have filed the PIL and result in agony of so many persons in Delhi. I am reiterating again that I am also sailing in the same boat, but we have to look at the picture from a broader angle. I know it is hard and pinches to pay for a same thing twice but sometime we have to bear with that pain for larger interest.
-
Permalink Reply by Babita Rawat on
-
Ok, now look at this scenario
If the admissions already done (before 10th April) would not have been done, i mean if there were no admissions till date (because of court order or other wise) and after HC or SC order, admissions would have started from june or say july, then if schools ask parents to pay from April, then also will you think of genuineness of schools to ask for fees from April onwards to pay salaries of staff, repair maintenance etc. and like to pay for them, if admission is done in july and session starts from July
-
-
Hi Puneet, its not about 2-3 month fee and certainly most of us are interested in sending our kids to school in time however if we see from school perspective they are charging fees during vacations as well and from thousands of students however they cut down on teacher's salary as most of them are adhoc and transportation cost as well apart from charging parents every now and then for something or the other.
For a larger ethical change we need small good chances which reflect an authentic ethical environment around us and schools should be the first to step in when it comes to moral responsibilities.
If its matter of bearing this small loss then why can't such big schools bear this small loss as we have parents who are in middle class group as well for whom even this small amount matters and what examples are school setting for society that they are ready to charge fees without providing anything to the children ?
The matter should be settled between court, DOE and schools and they need to come up with a concrete conclusion and orders and save time and money parents keep putting in the name of their Child's Welfare.
-
-
Dear Vishwas you are again taking a myopic view, what ever you have said is true but this situation is not a situation which is created every year (and hope should not be created in future). One has to make sacrifice for larger interest and soceity will flurish and survive if we may sacrifices. As I have said charity starts from home first or otherwise you are also free to file a PIL against it.
-
-
Understand Puneet but we dont need to mix money with peace of mind..if they keep asking you for money will we keep paying them for peace of mind, doesnt make sense. You need not pay for something where you are not getting anything in return..its as simple as that.
In case any parent for any genuine reason is unable to deposit fee for even 1 quarter schools will charge late fee amount or issue a warning against the parent and will throw the child out of school if you dont pay them fees after 2 or 3 circulars have been issued. They only understand business why should we be expected to think about charity for any reason.
Need to understand that we as parents will do everything for our kids but institutions and authorities take advantage of that and try to extract money in whichever way its possible so need some strict guidelines on not only fees but any undue amount being charged from parents.
-
-
My friend you are again thinking from your point of view. firstly you are mixing two things. This situation is unique and should be treated differently and what examples you are giving are of routine nature and should be treated as per the existing rule. So mixing two things of different nature is not good and nobody will make any guidelines regarding this particular situation.
-
-
Babita G, I am taking about the situation at present, as I have already mentioned in my earlier post schools have given some sort of guarantee to us that our wards will go to their school condition to that nothing drastic will not occur in future HC orders. The peace of mind that we enjoy at this point of time is nothing compared to fee for a quarter considering the tension that the parents whose ward names have not been there in any list and they are still waiting for admission. For the all buts and ifs, the famous saying of Mr. Sidhu, Agar Mere uncle meri anty hoti to……….............
© 2024 Created by Sumit Vohra (Webmaster).
Powered by
