Nursery Admissions in Delhi NCR 2026-27
Form Dates | Admission Criteria | Results | Fee Details | List of All Schools
DOE INSTRUCTS SCHOOLS TO REMOVE QUALIFICATION/PROFFESION POINTS Gyan bharti changes-dps mathura rd/bvn/ others also asked ?
just 3days left..this shud have been done before 15 jan..????
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Sandeep Gandhi on
-
I agree, for many people like you, including my self, parents background was the only saving grace. Nonetheless I still agree that "parents should be out" it is unfair to many others. But then the criterion should be uniform for all schools, there should not be any room for interpretation for any schools, for which it is too late in the day to do anything sereous as the whole process needs to start all over again.
-
-
THIS IS REALLY BAD .THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN WHEN FORMS WERE AVAILABLE FOR SALE.NOW WHAT IS THE USE WHEN RESULTS ARE OUT ALREADY IN MOST SCHOOLS.
-
-
I do not agree with this. Why should only education background be disregarded. Most of the good schools like vasant valley are giving huge weightage to national acheivement of parents. If education background should be ignored then national acheivement of parents can also be debated.
-
-
Even I think this could have done long back before the admission process started. It is difficult to understand the irresponsible behaviour of the DOE. And private players, that are unfortunately in the list of education providers in their own terms and conditions, are playing their own games.
-
-
Dear Mr. Vohra - all these hulla about profession and education background has created a situation now much worse that earlier, with only selected schools implementing the same and others already done with the process are exempt. I can't explain how much pain this has brought to parents who applied to schools offering these special points. We have now no clue as to what is the criterion for admission as on date - and no hope in getting to any decent school.
I hope soemday some one can take this plea to Mr. Lovely, and I hope I write on behalf of all such harassed parents - we should all sign the same and send it to DOE
-------------------------
Dear Mr. Lovely,
Here's a plea from a harassed parent - who till date was harassed by the schools and is now harassed by the DOE. In fact the DOE seems to be giving more room to the schools to harass parents.
The recent order to exclude parents qualification and profession from the qualificatioin criterian is a perfect example. First the order comes when many schools are already out with their lists, Most of these schools such as DPS give maximum marks to govt. servants, hence the timing couldn't please DOE officials and other govt. servants more.
Next it has no clarification on what has to be excluded from the grading criterion. If parents have to be out of the nursery admission process, then all of the following is non admissible in the points system:
1. Any educational qualification
2. Any profession including govt. service, police, armed forces, etc. (many schools have 3. special points for armed forces and govt. servants).
4. Points for transferable jobs.
5. Points for Alumni
6. Points on the basis of interaction
7. POints on the basis of group discussion
8. Any special reservations such as seats reserved for a particular class of officers wards.
Clearly there are so many exclusions now, that it would be better if DOE only specified inclusions. And the once left are only:
1. Points on distance
2. Points for Sibling
3. Points for Girl Child.
Since admissions in no schools is based on only these 3 points, all the process is wrong.
And at this late stage if due to DOEs threats only fue schools such as Sanskriti change their rules, parents of wards who specifically applied to schools offering points on the basis of admission loose out in a big way. Wouldn't this then amount to discrimination?
I am surprised at the ability of DOE to role out such ad-hoc directives at the last moment without giving a clear direction or much thought to it.
I hope you understand the plight of so many parents whose fate now hangs in limbo as simply because of bad timing and lack of clarity of other wise genuine and just effort by the govt.
I request your department to either make the decision mandatory on all schools in it's entirety and complete sereousness,; with a mechanism to monitor the revised process; this year, or implement the same in a well structure manner next year.
I hope my humble plea makes a positive impact.
Regards
Sandeep Gandhi
-
-
hi Sandeep, great points mentioned. Sumitji, please suggest how we should take this forward. I am willing to sign and be there for anything... I am sure we will have a lot of parents in this forum who are getting impacted. So lets join hands n work together against this.
JAI HO......
Sandeep Gandhi said:Dear Mr. Vohra - all these hulla about profession and education background has created a situation now much worse that earlier, with only selected schools implementing the same and others already done with the process are exempt. I can't explain how much pain this has brought to parents who applied to schools offering these special points. We have now no clue as to what is the criterion for admission as on date - and no hope in getting to any decent school.
I hope soemday some one can take this plea to Mr. Lovely, and I hope I write on behalf of all such harassed parents - we should all sign the same and send it to DOE
-------------------------
Dear Mr. Lovely,
Here's a plea from a harassed parent - who till date was harassed by the schools and is now harassed by the DOE. In fact the DOE seems to be giving more room to the schools to harass parents.
The recent order to exclude parents qualification and profession from the qualificatioin criterian is a perfect example. First the order comes when many schools are already out with their lists, Most of these schools such as DPS give maximum marks to govt. servants, hence the timing couldn't please DOE officials and other govt. servants more.
Next it has no clarification on what has to be excluded from the grading criterion. If parents have to be out of the nursery admission process, then all of the following is non admissible in the points system:
1. Any educational qualification
2. Any profession including govt. service, police, armed forces, etc. (many schools have 3. special points for armed forces and govt. servants).
4. Points for transferable jobs.
5. Points for Alumni
6. Points on the basis of interaction
7. POints on the basis of group discussion
8. Any special reservations such as seats reserved for a particular class of officers wards.
Clearly there are so many exclusions now, that it would be better if DOE only specified inclusions. And the once left are only:
1. Points on distance
2. Points for Sibling
3. Points for Girl Child.
Since admissions in no schools is based on only these 3 points, all the process is wrong.
And at this late stage if due to DOEs threats only fue schools such as Sanskriti change their rules, parents of wards who specifically applied to schools offering points on the basis of admission loose out in a big way. Wouldn't this then amount to discrimination?
I am surprised at the ability of DOE to role out such ad-hoc directives at the last moment without giving a clear direction or much thought to it.
I hope you understand the plight of so many parents whose fate now hangs in limbo as simply because of bad timing and lack of clarity of other wise genuine and just effort by the govt.
I request your department to either make the decision mandatory on all schools in it's entirety and complete sereousness,; with a mechanism to monitor the revised process; this year, or implement the same in a well structure manner next year.
I hope my humble plea makes a positive impact.
Regards
Sandeep Gandhi
-
-
The last-minute directive from the Department of Education is not only too late in the day but also a knee-jerk reaction under pressure from a powerful non-professional lobby. It will create huge chaos and uncertainty and serve to manipulate results to favour those whose wards would otherwise not find a place in some particular coveted schools.
There are 3 questions which need to be answered-
1. When all schools had submitted their selection parameters to the DoE way back before the registration process even began, why did the DoE not raise any objections or issue any guidance? The Minister says that "no approval was granted" but no rejection is always deemed approval, especially after the commencement of the process. The fresh directive is challengable in the Supreme Court but there's little time left now.
2. If it is unfair to deny nursery education to a child based on parents' profile, how is it fair to deny them admission if they have no sibling or parent who studied in the same school? Is it a child's fault that his parents could not find a house in the neighbourhood of a good school? Some schools like Mothers International have kept 60 points for alumni and sibling and 40 for neighbourhood. Technically speaking, it is very difficult for "outsiders" to get admission there. Isn't this blatantly discriminatory? Also, some schools give extra points to Government servants. Should this be allowed now? Therefore, logically speaking, all parameters can be challenged on one basis or the other but the way the DoE has acted against one parameter, in the last over of the game, raises serious concern.
3. If lessons are learnt, then next year, the DoE should fix universal parameters binding on ALL schools. The registration of forms should be a centralised process like in IIT-JEE exams and parents should indicate preference of schools. All seats should be allotted by the DoE based on points ranking and school preference. Isn't that the most fair process?
-
-
I think we have some very strong and valid points against this knee perk reaction by DOE, which can be challenged in the court, if they do not correct their own directive.
SumitJi is it possible for you to raise these with the DOE, or the media? Also can some parents with legal background help in legal action?
-
-
I think we have some very strong and valid points against this knee perk reaction by DOE, which can be challenged in the court, if they do not correct their own directive.
SumitJi is it possible for you to raise these with the DOE, or the media? Also can some parents with legal background help in legal action?
-
-
I think we have some very strong and valid points against this knee perk reaction by DOE, which can be challenged in the court, if they do not correct their own directive.
SumitJi is it possible for you to raise these with the DOE, or the media? Also can some parents with legal background help in legal action?
-
-
Sumitji and Sandeep,
It is very clear that influential people have tried to manipulate the process through DoE. We need legal help and better representation in media.
-
-
Another interesting development....if you go to the DoE website page for Feedback Form to Nursery Admissions, it says "you are not authorised to view the page"
They have taken the feedback they wanted, it seems.
About
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
© 2025 Created by Sumit Vohra (Webmaster).
Powered by
