I was just trying to visualise a communication between students of school, college etc

Scene  -

Students talking - A conversation between St Columba's students "Yaar Shahrukh Apne school ka pass out hai".

Parents talking -Parents within their circle - Mera beta us school me padhta hai jahan se Shahruk khan padha hai.. 

(This is mostly true for all schools, colleges, inst. Be it Amitabh in KMC, XYZ in some or the other school or college)

As few parents said that it is the matter of pride that their kids got to X school (Best school). Who made these schools?? Were alumnis important?? Everyone showcases the alumni strength to build on the reputation of the school. For me just like teachers, policies, administrations, principal etc even alumni are important ingredient in making the school. Talk to any school and they will tell you what role has alumni played in building stature of the school.. You are fighting for a school because alumnis of those schools have reached somewhere in their life..

Many students have passed out from a school/college but very few achieve big things and these people are leveraged forever in every conversation by school, students, parents etc. 

When someone make strong argument against sibling convenience/logistics is the prime reason.  

People always ask which is the good school.. What is the criteria under consideration?

1) Infrastructure 2) Extra-curricular 3) Management 4) Past records ?? (Is it one of the criterias that what is the track record of the school?) 5) many others may be.. 

I am not trying to validate alumni point but my concern is the way parents are talking crap about this criteria. Aren't they alumni of a school? Even I am from some school but I want my son to study in some other school but have no option due to these guidelines. But I have no complaints against the guidelines. It could have been raised 3 months back. Which no one did. 

(Pls note that I am not trying to support or oppose any criteria.. As I have been emphasising on my various posts.. For me whatever is the criteria should have been challenged in Dec and not now)