Nursery Admissions in Delhi NCR 2024-25
Admission Dates | Admission Criteria | Compare schools | Fee Details
Nursery Admissions - SC order dated 11 Apr 2014 - ALSO TENTATIVE ADVANCE LIST FOR (SUPREME COURT) HEARING
HIGH COURT ADVANCE CAUSE LIST FOR 16 APR 2014
COURT NO. 1
(DIVISION BENCH-1)
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
FOR ADMISSION
1. LPA 237/2014 NITIN BHATIA SAKAL BHUSHAN,SURENDRA
CM APPL. 4747/2014 Vs. MAJOR SAURABH CHARAN AND KUMAR,BALAJI BIRAJDAR,MANJIT
CM APPL. 5418/2014 ORS SINGH AHLUWALIA,ALAYA LEGAL
CM APPL. 5441/2014
CM APPL. 5451/2014
2. LPA 238/2014 MAJOR SAURABH CHARAN AND ORS LATIKA CHOUDHARY
CM APPL. 4822/2014 Vs. LT GOVERNOR, DELHI AND ORS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT ADVANCE CAUSE LIST- 21 APR
TENTATIVE ADVANCE LIST FOR 21 APR(SUPREME COURT)
155. SLP(C).../2014 MAJ. SAURABH CHARAN & ORS ETC MS.ADITI GUPTA XIV FRESH-H Vs. LT. GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI &
107, 0, 0 S.( 705) ORS ETC (FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP AND
1ST LISTING CC.No.6207-6208 OFFICE REPORT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014
CC 6207-6208/2014
(From the judgement and order dated 03/04/2014 in LPA
No.237/2014,LPA No.238/2014 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N.
DELHI)
MAJ. SAURABH CHARAN & ORS ETC Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
LT. GOVERNOR NCT OF DELHI & ORS ETC Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP and office report)
Date: 11/04/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nidesh Gupta, Sr. Adv.
Mr.Tarun Gupta, Adv.
Ms.Aditi Gupta,Adv.
Mr. M.K. Ghosh, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Permission to file SLP is granted.
Notice.
Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
In the meantime, the operation of the impugned
order shall remained stayed until further orders.
[ Charanjeet Kaur ]
Court Master
[ Vinod Kulvi ]
Asstt. Registrar
- Attachments:
-
-
SC order .docx, 100 KB
-
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by SACHHIN SAPRA on
-
Sakshi , next week there are only 3 working days in SC. Case in favour of IST problem is quite strong. Maximum what can be done is that group of parents can implead themselves in the above SLP which is yet to be numbered by SC registry. Some advocate can mention the case before SC in next 3 working days and can atleast get impleadment and early hearing permission. In normal course such cases take minimum 1 month to be re-listed but if judges are convinced then they can hear it urgently as well . But I dont see this coming up before 21st April.
I am sure aggrieved parents( alumni or selected 70 pointers) must already be preparing for impleadment.
Fee depends on who is arguing If senior advocate then minimum 35k per hearing by a new senior advocate old senior advocate no limit.
I believe your forum should make parents realise that courts will never make law/guidelines they can only upheld or strike down the guideline/law. It is LG or DOE who can now take initiative and come up with something innovative which will take things out of court. Maybe quota for every category, something which make every category compete/draw of lot (just a suggestion). Some are having cakewalk(sibling and alumni ) and other are left to destiny. Genuine IST even worse completely out of picture as per last HC order. Just can't trust DOE data it is full of gaping holes.
all the best
-
-
Neither alumni nor sibling are having cakewalk sir. Its the ppl,from outside who got additional 5 pts who are having cakewalk and they are the ppl creating all issues. Tell me one thing sir, does any Delhi person get a favorable treatment in any state outside Delhi. They are treated as second grade citizens and outsiders and for which there are innumerable examples in media too..so in my opinion kids whose parents are born and brought up in delhi and have paid their hard earned money as taxes for Delhi development(which i believe is not paid by outsiders)deserve special treatment and need to be domiciled to Delhi.
-
-
And such domiciled kids should be given first preference in all Delhi related matters including education.Further such domiciled educational preference should not be limited to nursery only, in fact it should be from nursery. To 12 standard, then in colleges of DU too.
-
-
Agreed to you Nitin.
-
-
You are absolutely right...they should consider Delhi as priority.
-
Permalink Reply by NISHESH on
-
As per HC order of 3/4/2014, selected 70 point-ers were asked to take admission, which is now stayed by SC, so that means selected 70 point-ers(paid fee also) may or may not be valid after final SC order... So in any case there is no point in starting session before SC final order(atleast for 70 point-ers)...
-
Permalink Reply by mahesh jain on
-
You are right
-
-
Jo log by birth delhi mein rehte hai unke child ka admission nahi hoga kya aur jo bahar se aaye hai fake transfer letter lekar unka admission hoga ye kaha ka kanoon hai agar aisa hota hai to bahot galat hoga dno ko 70 point milne chahiye .
-
-
Jo delhi mein rehte hai pehla unka hak hona chahiye aur 50% aise log bhi hai jinone ews ka nakli certificate bana rakha hai aur actual mein wo log rich hai aur middle class ko aur mar rahe hai pata nahi kb admissadmission hoga tareekh pe tareekh hi mlti hai chahe movie ho ya real
-
-
Sakshi, suppose incase worst case scenario there is going to be a redraw of70 pointers:what would be the decision of the court of those 70 pointers who by sheer luck has got more than one seat in schools(minority schools) but they had to surrender those seats as per the high court earlier verdict. Is the honourable court going to give those confirmed seats back to them? Don't you think those parents would be suffering just because of one wrong decision?
-
-
3rd April High Court order will be totally annuled and in that case alumni, sibling,girls quota and ews admissions will be confirmed and for balance seats 70 point redraw will take place all previous 70 point draw will be annulled.
-
-
court interventions clearly indicates the in efficiency of the education dept ..... more than that undue interference into the autonomy of selection by private schools ....
© 2024 Created by Sumit Vohra (Webmaster).
Powered by
