Nursery Admissions in Delhi NCR 2024-25

Admission Dates | Admission Criteria | Compare schools | Fee Details

DOE Notification dated 7 Mar 2014 after Hon HC Judgement with New Dates for results of Nursery Admissions for first list and others list with last date for Admissions in Nursery.

Click the link below

9 members like this

Comments are closed for this blog post

Comment by Sachin Nandwani on March 7, 2014 at 7:36pm: and i dont know why so much time is being given. Again people will keep on petioning in courts. Why do the schools need so much time. They have the forms already; just use them and do the draws. Its not that the filing of forms is being done again. So much time was given in the initial phase. Why the delay!

Comment by Raman Singh on March 7, 2014 at 7:31pm: @ Gitanjali suresh

Imagine Scenario1, presented in court
Open seats after Siblings + Alumni 100
Applicants 1000
Tfr cases 10
Original 70 Pointers 90
Chances in First draw 90 / (1000-10) 9.09%
Chances in Second draw 10 / (1000-90+10) 1.09%

Tfr pointers only got 1.09% chance of a seat.

While majority of 70 pointers got two chances 9.09% + 1.09% = 10.18%

Now imagine scenario 2, by reversing the the tfr and 70 pointers numbers
Open seats after Siblings + Alumni 100
Applicants 1000
Tfr cases 90
Original 70 Pointers 10
Chances in First draw 10 / (1000-90) 1.10%
Chances in Second draw 90 / (1000-10+90) 8.33%

Now Tfr pointers got 8.33% chance of a seat.

Majority of 70 pointers got two chances 1.10% + 8.33 % = 9.43%.

The difference is small (just 1.10%) but this can not be ignored considering the situation, every single % point counts.

Genuine Tfr pointers did nothing wrong. Govt gave them the points, and then they were scrapped. Why penalize genuine Tfr pointers for Govt's mistakes.

I think this is where the honorable HC saw merit in this plea. So, this may be hard on 70 pointers selected in first/second draw. Remember, Tfr 75 pointers also lost their confirmed seats.

As said by the court, inconvenience can not be the reason for injustice.

Comment by Sachin Nandwani on March 7, 2014 at 7:31pm: I agree with RG...whatever the process..the dates should be final as they were before...the list for all schools should come out on one date..and a couple of days should be given to submit the fees. The parent can then decide which school to admit his ward in and pay fees only in that school!

Comment by ABCD on March 7, 2014 at 7:28pm: There is no confusion on the HC order. It supports the ruling on 27th Feb. Please refer to link in case of any confusion :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lpvo-llvbJA

Comment by Gitanjali Suresh Nair on March 7, 2014 at 7:25pm: The hon HC was swayed by the statement that 70 pointers BEFORE TRF scrapping had a chance of 1:10 whereas the TRFs after scrapping had only a chance of 1:91, in a school with 100 seats and 1000 applicants.
I'm sorry but This is a gross LIE!!!

Before scrapping, poor 70 pointers had just about 5 seats in 100 remaining for them (often less). Do chances we're 5:1000 i.e 1:200.
After TRF scrapping, if 25 seats became available (often more), the new chances for everyone including poor TRFs became 25:(995+25) i.e approx 1:40.

So who's had a bad luck????
Too sad that Hon HC did not consider the truth in the PIL and just her did the counsel for govt speak on behalf if the selected 70 pointers.

Shame of the Game

Comment by shilpa malhotra on March 7, 2014 at 7:25pm: Does that mean the schools which have done draws will do it again?

Comment by hansveer sahni on March 7, 2014 at 7:25pm: This seems like a circus happening !!

Comment by Jatil Kumar Singhal on March 7, 2014 at 7:24pm: Lathaa ji can something done for first list date atleast, it should be one date for schools..

Comment by Mukesh Shokeen on March 7, 2014 at 7:21pm: Did not understand, what does they mean by "wherever necessary"?

Comment by dr v k gupta on March 7, 2014 at 7:17pm: yes.all the first list should be on 7april so that their is no blockage of seats and wastage of money.