Form Dates | Admission Criteria | Results | Fee Details | List of All Schools
Untill and unless alumni points are scrapped together with transfer pointers than only we 70 pointers will not get seat in any school.As I feel in all schools where draw is for 75 pointers ,50% are alumni and hence they are in waistline.now those seat will get confirmed after transfer r put in 70 points and there will not be any chance for 70 pointers.Schools will not take the pain to redraw and they will only fill the vacant seat from the wait list. Alumni r always welcome in every schoolSo we have to appeal for scarping of alumni points also and only than it will be fair for all kids..
Tags:
We should inform the Doe that when all the transfered 75 pointers will be removed from confirmed list ...the vacant seats will be fill by the 75 pointers from waitlist and there will be no chance for the 70 pointers...God pls help us...
What I am saying is that : "We should inform the Doe that when all the transfered 75 pointers will be removed from confirmed list…than those seat will be automatically filled by the 75 Alumni from waitlist" (and there is already a confirmed list and waitlist of 70 poiters list...which will remain as it was)Than in this scenario those removed from TP will never get a chance to participate in draw.This is not their fault that they have claim transfer point...Doe should understand this point.So a redraw for all 70 pointers a must.
alumni points are not justified and the points for distance should be staggered.It should be 70 points for 1-3 km,60 points for 3.1-6 km,50 points for 6.1-8 km,40 points for above 8km
Who said being alumni is illegal? Alumni do honour the schools by achieving marvellous targets . It is the imbalanced guideline which steering our thoughts? Dont you think that at current situation 5 alumni points is big setback fair chance to every kid? How a first kid residing just opposite to a reputed school will get the right opportunity? for 10 seats 10k kids will compete.. is not all this nonsense?
Alumni quota can be there not wholesome 5 point like transfer cases in current scenario. Even if it is lesser evil at this situation ..still it is evil all coz of the imbalance in point allocation.
Deepti - agree. Moreover one should also question the logic of a separate girl child quota in the general category! Not sure why boys should be denied their right to good education. Also, in the ensuing confusion, a lot of genuine transfer case parents could have lost out.
Whenever I read this forum I feel that everyone wants the rule to be customised as per his/her likings. eg:
1) Transfer cases - Was there an issue of transfer case criteria or genuine transfer case criteria. Now when the transfer case criteria is abolished people are worried about genuine transfer cases.
2) Alumni - Is the problem with Alumni criteria or Alumni of Good Schools? No one will ever crib about someone getting additional points under alumni criteria in average schools but the problem is in schools like DPS RKP, EOK etc.
I am an alumni of a Delhi school which was not very renowned but do not want my kid to study in that school. There may be many parents who do not want their kids to study in the school in which they studied. An everyone has been an alumni of some or the other school. I agree someone might have shifted etc but what about the ones who have not shifted and spent their entire life.. And it is the Alumni that adds to the school reputation as they carry their school name forever. So what is the problem in this criteria I fail to understand. eg SRK and St Columba's School. Given a situation does his kids deserve to be a part of this school?? For that matter take any CEO, MD of a co...
I think it is only about good schools that people are worried of... No one will ever be bothered about not so popular/good schools.
© 2025 Created by Sumit Vohra (Webmaster).
Powered by
helpdesk@admissionsnursery.com