Comment

Comment by Sakshi (Moderator) on March 29, 2014 at 7:09pm

Julin

Doe will post new corrected list that they produced in court yesterday before 2 Apr.

Comment by Juin De on March 29, 2014 at 3:35pm

As mentioned by Aarun Kumar Jalua in his post, the education department has submitted data which showed majority of children admitted in the first draw of lots belonged to 70 pointers. On the other hand the reality is  the 70 pointers did not get the oppurtunity for lottery in the first draw. On the basis of this report HC may take a decision on 2nd April which will be grossly wrong. Hope Sakshi and Mr Vohra look into the matter.

Comment by Naresh walia on March 28, 2014 at 4:33pm

What is highcourt decision today

Comment by lakhvinder on March 27, 2014 at 2:42pm

               

@ Sakshi Moderator & Mr. Sumit VOhara N AN team::

I heared a news abt Tagore international East Of Kailash they are already done the admission process and individualy call the candidates to collect the School uniform and books for their kids in nursery admission 2014-15. one of my known has already collected the same n session is started on 4th April.

how it can be possible as Govt has stoped process and as per tagore web site they had manstioned there admission is till suspended as per govt order then how they are doing the admission

Please look into this matter n reply Please.

Comment by Prabhu Dayal on March 27, 2014 at 2:42pm

I agree with you Reeta ji, These are certainly not heros in the eyes of public of delhi, All they have brought to us is tears and only tears.

Comment by Suneet Sethi on March 27, 2014 at 2:39pm

@ Anamika - what data is showing cannot be doubted and it clearly throws up the reality. the issue is that parents filled up forms only in top 20 schools and expected that their ward should be selected or the system is flawed. Every parent would have gone for the schools you must have applied so its a fair deal. why parents are challenging everything now  - only after realizing that they don't have a seat and want to support that we run the process again and again till the time the ward does not get the seat. please remember your loss is someone's gain and vice versa. Lawyers did a fantastic job to put arguments in PIL so that they are accepted, so the others followed and now basis data it will be highlighted what is fair and what is not. the very fact is that IST points were announced by Govt. so they leveraged it. they became a punching bag as 70 pointers dint make it but now even siblings and alumni are being targeted. best way to move forward is to accept what has happened and lessons learned but data cannot be challenged. emotions and practicality should be kept separate.

Comment by Anamika Paul on March 27, 2014 at 2:27pm

I really dont know how come anyone says that there is a huge opportunity for 70 pointers. I am in South Delhi and have filled up 18 forms for my boy. Most schools the draw was not held for 70 pointers even after removal of transfer cases. Some after removal of transfer cases and filling them with alumni wherever the draw was held it had a average ratio of 1 seat per 200 kids with 70 points. we didnt file any PIL but are patiently waiting for the process to start like others here. atleast once the process start maybe in the second or third list there can be some hope for my boy. However, it still hurts when other parents think that 70 pointers have a huge opportunity.

Comment by Prabhu Dayal on March 27, 2014 at 2:07pm

I ask a question to you all Forum Member the real public of delhi,

I need a opinion from you guys the real Public of Delhi  about a small group of around 10 parents (Non-Domicile of Delhi) who are responsible for the Main 2 Pills the First PIL (That Started all this) that was against Transfer Points, And the 2nd PIL that is against scrapping of Alumni & Sibling points (The one that is currently going on in court) - What do you (The Public of Delhi) think are these 10 Parents HEROS in the eyes of Delhi Public?

Comment by Nandita Gupya on March 27, 2014 at 1:32pm

The DOE does not care about categorization of schools, we are the ones who categorize or there are differnet surveys that rate schools and some become better than the other or become 1-10 or 1-15 in rating. The DOE and the HC should see the total numbers of seats available and what are being filled by sibling and Alumni, and thye data itself says that there is a huge oppurtunity open for 70 pointers, let the things progress...............

Comment by ABCD on March 27, 2014 at 12:22pm

no one is calling them "top 10-15 schools". I think the lawyers are trying to present an overall picture by restricting their pitch to a select schools. But the argument does not hold because it can be easily countered by a more comprehensive data set. The term "top" school hasn't been discussed in the court because it does not have any justificaition

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 8
• Next ›
• Page