Form Dates | Admission Criteria | Results | Fee Details | List of All Schools
1. Distance from the school is the only criterion that affects a child physically. No other criterion affects the child physically. Criteria like siblings, transferable jobs, awardee parents, single parent and so on are just discriminatory.
2. If more children are sent to neighbourhood schools, all neighbourhood schools would have a chance to develop.
3. Eventually, people would become "proximity" conscious than "brand" conscious.
4. Siblings would stand a greater chance of getting into the same school as they will also qualify for the neighbourhood points like their siblings.
Tags:
Asking schools to adhere to a certain admission criteria is not overregulation. In fact, it is a necessity to prevent nepotism and corruption.
Again, you are missing the point. We are talking about physical comfort getting priority over mental comfort. Physical comfort is something that can be predicted, but mental comfort can be gauged only after the kid has entered the school.
As I mentioned earlier, I am ready to send my kid to a govt school if the "area only" criteria is applied. You can find a detailed reply in the previous pages.
And yes, for you it is "the sad part" that somebody is trying to make the admission process "non discriminatory". That says it all. No need to even expand on that
In a TV discussion yesterday, when the private schools' representative was asked why neighbourhood+lottery criteria is not being implemented for non-EWS students, she had no answer. On being asked why private schools are so worried about scrapping of the point system, again she had no answer. Most importantly, the petitioner in the HC case, who was present in the discussion along with this website's founder, said he expects the verdict to come within next 10 days. Boy it's gonna be a long, treacherous Feb! :-(
Yeah Akshat.
The other day Shashi Tharoor distanced RTE from nursery admissions on technical grounds. What a shame.
defenitely neighbourhood should be the only criteria and it is good for the child. he does not have to sit in school bus for hours .and parents could visit frequently to school.Why torture the kids by forcing them to travel long distance?
I think Neighborhood policy is the right policy. Even in advanced countries like Japan, US, UK school admissions are done purely on neighborhood criteria. In US they have a concept of school district and push for students from neighborhood only and even property prices go up for the areas which have good schools. On the similar lines you have concept of community colleges. I would never send my child to a school which is far from my home till he/she is 10 years old.
Schools should do surprise home visits to verifiy the addresses. The concept has to be neighborhood based only so if you shift your residence you should shift your child's school so that he/she is not forced to travel distances at such tender age. As for fake rentals - god help those who want to start their children's education on lies. I completely agree with fellow boarders that this govt has completely failed in getting its basics right on everything. If you start thinking on 1000's of parameters you can never formulate the right policy or set of rules. The policy forumulation should be on basics like the pressure on child (4+ age only), risk involved in travel etc..
© 2025 Created by Sumit Vohra (Webmaster).
Powered by
helpdesk@admissionsnursery.com