Nursery Admissions in Delhi NCR 2025-26
Form Dates | Admission Criteria | Results | Fee Details | List of All Schools
PARENTS WHO WILL SUFFER -IF CHANGE OF POINTS IN EDUCATION/PROFFESION POINTS HAPPENS
WE WILL TRY TO RAISE THE ISSUE TOMMOROW IN HINDUSTAN TIMES /TOI !!
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Shival Manchanda on
-
I am thankful to God that He hasn’t given enough sensibility to a 3 year old child to wonder upon some questions-
“why am I rejected because my parents were not alumini in the school”,
“what is my fault if my sibling is not studying in this school”,
“how can interaction with my parents decide whether I should be admitted or not”,
“why are there no good school in the neighbourhood”,
“why do my parents have to give extra money to the school without receipt”,
“why do the city has less good schools, infact why there is a good school and not so good school”,
"why am i being weighed on points which keeps on changing every now and then because DoE themselves are not sure about it"
I think DOE should focus on “Quality Education for All” and try to create infrastructure that supports the population.
Check this out-
http://education.nic.in/policyprouncements.htm
Hope things change faster. Its been 3 yrs since that speech.
-
-
Its too late in the day to be changing rules.2 days to go for the lists to come out and now this change?????This is not fair
-
-
Lets try to see whats the way forward rather than cribbing about what has happened and could have been done. I personally feel Mr. Lovely wanted to favour a few schools and hence he waited for their fee payment date to get over and kicked up this ruckus the same evening. I believe he deserves the points in the professional criteria if he ever applies for admissions for his kids. Done like a true professional.
To answer Sumit's query the following are the details of the schools and how much points we have lost:
Tagore - 30
Gyan - atleast 30
Heritage - 30
Sanskriti - 40
Laxman Public - 20
Ryan - 10
Bloom - 10
Now the points i would like to highlight are these three:
1. After this order we don't stand a chance in the most of schools which were very promising till yesterday
2. We had admissions in Amity which we have foregone since we had 70 points in heritage which was a school of choice for us. Now I am at 40 points in heritage. I have not stopped kicking myself. (But since Mr. Lovely is so friendly with Amity, may be he can help me get back my seat!)
3. The most critical issues is that we made a shortlist of schools to apply by seeing where we stand a good chance on the basis of the given criteria. Now we realise that in the chanced circumstances our entire short list was flawed and we shoud have applied to different schools, this means we have not been given a fair chance.
Now the way forwrd should be that some of us through this forum should club funds and take a stay order first thing Monday morning.
However, to clarify my stand let me say that inspite of both of us being PGs and professionals we see the sense in saying that a child's admission should not depend on the parent's qualifications. It is like the rich becoming richer story. But, the way this is done is bad and to be fair to us, all other discrimatory criteria should also be removed.
SUMIT, CAN YOU HELP US WITH THE STAY. WE WILL BE MORE THAT WILLING TO PAY FOR IT
-
-
We'd lose the following points...
Tagore - 30
Gyan Bharti - 30
Sanskriti - 40
Laxman Public - 20
Ryan - 10
Bloom - 10
-
-
I think withdrawing points for parents' education and profession will make sense only if the entire point system is reviewed.
1. Alumni points : clearly discriminates against people who have moved within delhi or come from outside delhi. What purpose does it solve? Are schools trying to create some kind of legacy classes - grandfather, father, son and their 20 next generations from the same school....wow!!
2. Sibling : Clearly discriminates against those who are admitting their First child!!
3. Neighbourhood points : Schools have their own way of defining...some schools are OK with getting students from 15 kms!!
4. Cultural/social contributions- what is meant by this? How do you define it?
5. Educational qualification/profession of parents: Children cannot be discriminated against coz their parents did not study or land-up a good job for whatever reasons!!
And then whats the point of having a point system when schools are deciding on their on to not even display points against those called for interaction or shortlisted for admission!!!!
The only criteria should be neighbourhood....and the distance points should be uniformly decided!!!
-
-
Very True. DOE should make a uniform point system for each school rather than deciding by each school individualy to avoid such sort of confusion. Either point system should go away or it should not indescriminate for any sort of criteria. Each criteria looks to indescriminate.
Rahul S Dogar said:I think withdrawing points for parents' education and profession will make sense only if the entire point system is reviewed.
1. Alumni points : clearly discriminates against people who have moved within delhi or come from outside delhi. What purpose does it solve? Are schools trying to create some kind of legacy classes - grandfather, father, son and their 20 next generations from the same school....wow!!
2. Sibling : Clearly discriminates against those who are admitting their First child!!
3. Neighbourhood points : Schools have their own way of defining...some schools are OK with getting students from 15 kms!!
4. Cultural/social contributions- what is meant by this? How do you define it?
5. Educational qualification/profession of parents: Children cannot be discriminated against coz their parents did not study or land-up a good job for whatever reasons!!
And then whats the point of having a point system when schools are deciding on their on to not even display points against those called for interaction or shortlisted for admission!!!!
The only criteria should be neighbourhood....and the distance points should be uniformly decided!!!
-
-
Very true. Everyone has applied the schools after looking up the forms & criteria. Its too late now to change for this year. If anything is to be done should be for the coming year........
Latha vinukumar said:Lets try to see whats the way forward rather than cribbing about what has happened and could have been done. I personally feel Mr. Lovely wanted to favour a few schools and hence he waited for their fee payment date to get over and kicked up this ruckus the same evening. I believe he deserves the points in the professional criteria if he ever applies for admissions for his kids. Done like a true professional.
To answer Sumit's query the following are the details of the schools and how much points we have lost:
Tagore - 30
Gyan - atleast 30
Heritage - 30
Sanskriti - 40
Laxman Public - 20
Ryan - 10
Bloom - 10
Now the points i would like to highlight are these three:
1. After this order we don't stand a chance in the most of schools which were very promising till yesterday
2. We had admissions in Amity which we have foregone since we had 70 points in heritage which was a school of choice for us. Now I am at 40 points in heritage. I have not stopped kicking myself. (But since Mr. Lovely is so friendly with Amity, may be he can help me get back my seat!)
3. The most critical issues is that we made a shortlist of schools to apply by seeing where we stand a good chance on the basis of the given criteria. Now we realise that in the chanced circumstances our entire short list was flawed and we shoud have applied to different schools, this means we have not been given a fair chance.
Now the way forwrd should be that some of us through this forum should club funds and take a stay order first thing Monday morning.
However, to clarify my stand let me say that inspite of both of us being PGs and professionals we see the sense in saying that a child's admission should not depend on the parent's qualifications. It is like the rich becoming richer story. But, the way this is done is bad and to be fair to us, all other discrimatory criteria should also be removed.
SUMIT, CAN YOU HELP US WITH THE STAY. WE WILL BE MORE THAT WILLING TO PAY FOR IT
-
-
I am also suffering the same. My daughter didn't get through Amity, Apeejay Saket and Apeejay Sheikh Sarai. Both these Apeejay had given out points in the name of "Representative Affirmative Criteria", no body even know what is the basis of the point. That time our minister Mr. Lovely never ever interfered. Now when the list is all set to come up he thought to write off the professional and qualification degrees, making the whole admission process a chaos.
Now we also suffered atleast 20 - 30 points in rest of the schools we applied for. It seems that having a first child with no alumni and sibling points, and not being a national awardee it's our own fault to hope for a good school.
-
-
THIS IS FOR MR. SUNIL, IF U DON'T HELP OTHERS PLEASE DO NOT TALK RUBBISH ABOUT A PERSON (AND A FORUM) WHO IS OF IMMENSE HELP FOR THE PARENTS. AND MR. VOHRA NEVER PERSONALLY ASKED THE SOUTH DELHI PARENTS TO JOIN THE FORUM. THERE ARE MANY PARENTS WHO ARE FROM OTHER PARTS OF DELHI. SO NOT KNOWING MUCH ABOUT THE FORUM DON'T TALK NON SENSE
Sunil said:With only 160 posts to this discussions in past 24 hours, it appears only a few of thousands of parents who are seeking admission of their child are affected. if you carefully examine the replies of the parents, most of them have mentioned schools which are based in South Delhi only. As such this discussion is biased and cannot be termed as representing parents from all of Delhi.
-
-
GIVING POINTS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE/DEFENCE AND POLICE IS ALSO DISCRIMANATORY BY SANSKRITI AND DPS
tweety khatri said:Admin OptionsEdit Discussion
Close Discussion Add Tags
Cancel
Delete Discussion
1)Getting schools to change their point system when half the schools have already come out with their lists
smacks of discrimination.These new guidelines should either be for all the schools or for none.
2)These guidelines should have been issued before the beginning of the admission process.Parents had made an informed choice about filling up the forms depending upon the existing point system.Changing the point system at this stage has left them completely flabbergasted.Now who is going to compensate for their loss if they don't secure admission for their child in the limited number of schools whose form they had filled and the point systems of which have suddenly been changed. Either start the whole process anew or leave it as it it.
3)If giving points for parents' educational background is discriminatory then going by the same parameters,giving points for alumni or sibling is also discriminatory.So creating these new guidelines at this late stage is completely uncalled for.
-
-
what about sibling and alumni points? why is this not being considered as discrimination? 5 years ago if we were living in South Delhi and now we are in some other part of delhi how do u think we can get points for being an alumni in some x school where we will not even be elgible because of the neighbourhood criteria. What is our fault if our child is the first child????
this is soo dissapointing! what is the surety that we will get admission in our vincity if we are getting points only for the neighbourhood and there will be soo many people who would be alumni and will also have sibling points. why are schools giving extra points for girl child???? is'nt that DISCRIMINATATION???? . Are'nt there enough schools for girls in Delhi???And why points for transferrable job??? Is'nt that a part of parents background. Moreover most of the children will be in playschool before getting into nursery sooo there is no need for this criteria.
If the parents background is not considered then dont u think the results of the school will get affected?? there is far difference in a thought process as well as approach towards education between a professional and a businessman.This is a fact and everyone knows it.... but are scared to say it in public.
So the crux of the matter is if DOE has removed the parents Qualifications..... then they should consider removing points for alumni, sibling, transferable job and girl child. THIS IS OUTRIGHT DISCRIMINATION!!
Why is all this confusion hapening just 2 days before the result?? was'nt there enough chaos earlier that this has happend.
-
-
what is the point of changing the points at this time when all the schools had clearly given their breakup 2 months back. If so many parents had an issue with the point breakup why did'nt they raise their voices then. Because their wards have not been selected they think it's now unfair.
The suggestions given now could have been given earlier. Why add to the confusion??? I agree this point system is not fair to everyone and some
solution has to come with collective suggestion but foe next year.
About
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
© 2025 Created by Sumit Vohra (Webmaster).
Powered by
